Just a few minutes ago the Supreme Court released their decision in the Mayo case, see here for the Simply Statistics summary of the case. The court ruled unanimously that the personalized medicine test could not be patented. Such a strong ruling likely has major implications going forward for the field of personalized medicine. At the end of the day, this decision was based on an interpretation of statistical correlation. Stay tuned for a special in-depth analysis in the next couple of days that will get into the details of the ruling and the implications for personalized medicine.
-

-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Keith O'Rourke on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Desmond on When does replication reveal fraud?
- usinoz on Sunday data/statistics link roundup (5/19/2013)
- Daniel Scharfstein on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Peter Klaren on When does replication reveal fraud?
Categories
Archives
Meta