Depending on where you land in the political spectrum you may either love or despise Fox News. But regardless of your political affiliation, you have to recognize that their statisticians are well-trained in the art of using graphics to persuade folks of a particular viewpoint. I'm not the first to recognize that the graphics department uses some clever tricks to make certain points. But when flipping through the graphs I thought it was interesting to highlight some of the techniques they use to persuade. Some are clearly classics from the literature, but some are (as far as I can tell) newly developed graphical "persuasion" techniques.

**Truncating the y-axis**

(via)

and

(via)

This is a pretty common technique for leading the question in statistical graphics, as discussed here and elsewhere.

**Numbers that don't add up**

I'm not sure whether this one is intentional or not, but it crops up in several places and I think is a unique approach to leading information, at least I couldn't find a reference in the literature. Basically the idea is to produce percentages that don't add to one, allowing multiple choices to have closer percentages than they probably should:

(via)

or to suggest that multiple options are all equally likely, but also supported by large percentages:

(via)

**Changing the units of comparison**

When two things are likely to be very similar, one approach to leading information is to present variables in different units. Here is an example where total spending for 2010-2013 is compared to deficits in 2008. This can also be viewed as an example of not labeling the axes.

(via)

**Changing the magnitude of units at different x-values**

Here is a plot where the changes in magnitude at high x-values are higher than changes in magnitude at lower x-values. Again, I think this is actually a novel graphical technique for leading readers in one direction.

(via)

To really see the difference, compare to the graph with common changes in magnitude at all x-values.

(via)

**Changing trends by sub-sampling x values** (also misleading chart titles)

Here is a graph that shows unemployment rates over time and the corresponding chart with the x-axis appropriately laid out.

(via)

One could argue these are mistakes, but based on the consistent displays of data supporting one viewpoint, I think these are likely the result of someone with real statistical training who is using data in a very specific way to make a point. Obviously, Fox News isn't the only organization that does this sort of thing, but it is interesting to see how much effort they put into statistical graphics.

Pingback: Media Thread

Pingback: Re graphical manipulation of statistics, Fox News reveres the classics, but isn’t afraid to innovate

Pingback: Re graphical manipulation of statistics, Fox News reveres the classics, but isn’t afraid to innovate | icesrvic

Pingback: apoorvtrivedi.com » The statisticians at Fox News use classic and novel graphical techniques to lead with data | Simply Statistics

Pingback: Lies, Damn Lies, and Fox Graphs | ***Dave Does the Blog

Pingback: 10 Tuesday PM Reads | The Big Picture

Pingback: Counterparties: UnTrade | Felix Salmon

Pingback: I give up, I am embracing pie charts | Simply Statistics

Pingback: Jamie Belizaire

Pingback: Analysis: How Fox News uses graphical techniques to skew data and statistics - politiColonel — politiColonel

Pingback: Four short link: 27 November 2012 - O'Reilly Radar

Pingback: The Visual Presentation of Misleading Information, Anti-Asian Bias Edition – Uncertain Principles

Pingback: EXPOSED: Here Are The Tricks That Fox News Uses To Manipulate Statistics On Their Graphics | FreeZa

Pingback: 2251 Wall St » EXPOSED: Here Are The Tricks That Fox News Uses To Manipulate Statistics On Its Graphics

Pingback: What to read this morning: news, analysis & smart takes — Tech News and Analysis

Pingback: What to read this morning: news, analysis & smart takes ← techtings

Pingback: EXPOSED: Here Are The Tricks That Fox News Uses To Manipulate Statistics On Its Graphics | Delaware Reason

Pingback: What to read this morning: news, analysis & smart takes | GameBooze – Bottoms up! Aggregated gaming news, guides, cheats and fixes to quench your gaming needs.

Pingback: Sheeple | ansible

Pingback: Statistics – Fox Style | Análise Real

Pingback: Your Questions About Google Finance | Top Apprentice Blog

Pingback: Visualisierungstricks

Pingback: The Chart Equivalent of Comic Sans..? « OUseful.Info, the blog…

Pingback: In Defense Of Statistics Or, Why Data Scientists Should Make Understanding Statistics a Priority « Introduction to Data Science, Columbia University

Pingback: Craig Kveton

Pingback: Self Defense and Statistics | Maine Martial Arts

Pingback: Potpourri: Statistik #4 | Erik Gahner Larsen

Pingback: optionweb.net

Pingback: xtb brokers

Pingback: Media Manipulates Statistics « Distinction In English

Pingback: Ulysses Monserrat

Pingback: Arnette Tes

Pingback: cholesterol lowering diet

Pingback: buy edu backlinks

Pingback: pediatric nurse scrubs

Pingback: pediatric nurse practitioner certification review guide

Pingback: neonatal nurse practitioner programs

Pingback: neonatal nurse book

Pingback: registered nurse salary hospitals

Pingback: asset protection trust

Pingback: symptoms of skin cancer

Pingback: lottery euro millions results

Pingback: Catherine Vandewerker

Pingback: maids durham

Pingback: Edgar Mane

Pingback: Maxwell Messamore

Pingback: Teodoro Herz

Pingback: Assorted Links

Pingback: Jasa SEO