-
-
Recent Posts
- When does replication reveal fraud?
- The bright future of applied statistics
- Sunday data/statistics link roundup (5/12/2013, Mother's Day!)
- A Shiny web app to find out how much medical procedures cost in your state.
- Why the current over-pessimism about science is the perfect confirmation bias vehicle and we should proceed rationally
Recent Comments
- Howard Johnson on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Patrick Rogers on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Henrik Kristensen on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Andy Mitchell on When does replication reveal fraud?
- Ken on When does replication reveal fraud?
Categories
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Ioannidis
Why I disagree with Andrew Gelman's critique of my paper about the rate of false discoveries in the medical literature
With a colleague, I wrote a paper titled, "Empirical estimates suggest most published medical research is true" which we quietly posted to ArXiv a few days ago. I posted to the ArXiv in the interest of open science and because … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged blog fight, gelman, Ioannidis, rate of false positives, swfdr
28 Comments
Does NIH fund innovative work? Does Nature care about publishing accurate articles?
Editor's Note: In a recent post we disagreed with a Nature article claiming that NIH doesn't support innovation. Our colleague Steven Salzberg actually looked at the data and wrote the guest post below. Nature published an article last month with the provocative title … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Citations, highly-cited, innovation, Ioannidis, nature, NIH, NIH funding, reproducibility, salzberg
12 Comments