A proposal for a really fast statistics journal

Admin
2012-03-14

I know we need a new journal like we need a good poke in the eye. But I got fired up by the recent discussion of open science (by Paul Krugman and others) and the seriously misguided Research Works Act- that aimed to make it illegal to deposit published papers funded by the government in Pubmed central or other open access databases.

I also realized that I spend a huge amount of time/effort on the following things: (1) waiting for reviews (typically months), (2) addressing reviewer comments that are unrelated to the accuracy of my work - just adding citations to referees papers or doing additional simulations, and (3) resubmitting rejected papers to new journals - this is a huge time suck since I have to reformat, etc. Furthermore, If I want my papers to be published open-access I also realized I have to pay at minimum $1,000 per paper

So I thought up my criteria for an ideal statistics journal. It would be accurate, have fast review times, and not discriminate based on how interesting an idea is. I have found that my most interesting ideas are the hardest ones to get published.  This journal would:

To achieve such a fast review time, here is how it would work. We would have a large group of Associate Editors (hopefully 30 or more). When a paper was received, it would be assigned to an AE. The AEs would agree to referee papers within 2 days. They would use a form like this:
  • Review of: Jeff’s Paper
  • Technically Correct: Yes
  • About statistics/computation/data analysis: Yes
  • Number of Stars: 3 stars

  • 3 Strengths of Paper (1 required): 
  • This paper revolutionizes statistics 

  • 3 Weakness of Paper (1 required): 
    • The proof that this paper revolutionizes statistics is pretty weak
    •     <li>
            because he only includes one example.
          </li>
        </ul></blockquote> 
      
        <div>
        </div>
      
        <div>
          That&#8217;s it, super quick, super simple, so it wouldn&#8217;t be hard to referee. As long as the answers to the first two questions were yes, it would be published. 
        </div>
      
        <div>
        </div>
      
        <div>
          So now here&#8217;s my questions: 
        </div>
      
        <div>
        </div>
      
        <div>
          <ol>
            <li>
              Would you ever consider submitting a paper to such a journal?
            </li>
            <li>
              Would you be willing to be one of the AEs for such a journal? 
            </li>
            <li>
              Is there anything you would change? 
            </li>
          </ol>
        </div>
      
        <div>
        </div></div>