Apple’s Touch ID and a worldwide lesson in sensitivity and specificity

Roger Peng

I’ve been playing with my new iPhone 5s for the last few weeks, and first let me just say that it’s an awesome phone. Don’t listen to whatever Jeff says. It’s probably worth it just for the camera, but I’ve been particularly interested in the behavior of Apple’s fingerprint sensor (a.k.a. Touch ID). Before the phone came out, there were persistent rumors of a fingerprint sensor from now-defunct AuthenTec, and I wondered how the sensor would work given that it was unlikely to be perfect.

Apple reportedly sold 9 million iPhone 5c and 5s models over the opening weekend alone. Of those, about 7 million were estimated to be the 5s model which includes the fingerprint sensor (the 5c does not include it). So now millions of people have been using this thing and I’m getting the sense that many people are experiencing the same behavior I’ve observed over the last few weeks.

If my experiences in any way reflect reality, it seems to make sense. Apple had to make some choices on what cutoffs to make for false positives and negatives, and I think they erred on the side of security. Having a high specificity is critical because that prevents a bad guy from accessing the phone. A low sensitivity is annoying, but not critical because the correct user could always type in a passcode. As for modifying the behavior based on the task, that seems to make sense too because you can’t buy songs or apps without first unlocking the phone.

Overall, I think Apple did a good job with the fingerprint sensor, especially for  version 1.0. I’m guessing they’re making improvements in the technology/software as we speak and will want to improve the sensitivity before they start using it for more tasks or applications.